SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in inflammatory neurological conditions: a multicentre retrospective comparative study.

It is well established that neurological and non-neurological autoimmune disorders can be triggered by viral infections. It remains unclear whether SARS-CoV-2 infection induces similar conditions and whether they show a distinctive phenotype. We retrospectively identified patients with acute inflammatory CNS conditions referred to our laboratory for antibody testing during the pandemic (March 1 to August 31, 2020). We screened SARS-COV-2 IgA/IgG in all sera by ELISA and confirmed the positivity with additional assays. Clinical and paraclinical data of SARS-COV-2-IgG seropositive patients were compared to those of seronegative cases matched for clinical phenotype, geographical zone, and timeframe. SARS-CoV-2-IgG positivity was detected in 16/339 (4%) sera, with paired CSF positivity in 3/16. 5 of these patients had atypical demyelinating disorders and 11 autoimmune encephalitis syndromes. 9/16 patients had a previous history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and 6 of them were symptomatic. In comparison with 32 consecutive seronegative controls, SARS-CoV-2-IgG-positive patients were older, frequently presented with encephalopathy, had lower rates of CSF pleocytosis and other neurological autoantibodies, and were less likely to receive immunotherapy. When SARS-CoV-2 seropositive versus seronegative cases with demyelinating disorders were compared no differences were seen. Whereas seropositive encephalitis patients less commonly showed increased CSF cells and protein, our data suggest that an antecedent symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection can be detected in patients with autoimmune neurological conditions. These cases are rare, usually do not have specific neuroglial antibodies.

Coping Strategies and Mental Health during the Covid-19 Pandemic: An Italian Survey

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic is still having a strong impact on psychological and mental health worldwide. The pandemic generated a change in people's life and fear, loss of structure of daily routine, physical illness, depression, and stress, are only some of the potentially long-term consequences. The coping strategies used to deal with these difficulties may have influenced the perception of well-being, so the present study aimed to evaluate mental health in relation to individual characteristics and to explore the more effective coping strategies used by the Italian population and their impact on psychological well-being. Method(s): The web-based survey was delivered by Qualtrics between 30 November and 10 December 2020. A total of 537 individuals (>18) were recruited and all participants completed measures of sociodemographic data, general psychological well-being (PGWBI), and coping strategies (COPE-NVI). Result(s): Females, students, and unmarried people reported the lowest levels of mental health. Specifically, the coping strategy called "positive attitude" was positively correlated with psychological well-being, while "avoidance" and "social support strategies" negatively influenced it. The coping strategies named "problem-focused" and "transcendentoriented" resulted not statistically significant. Conclusion(s): The use of maladaptive strategies (e.g., avoidance-oriented) set up negative symptoms such as anxiety or depression whereas the beneficial ones can be central to optimally managing the psychological effects of long-lasting current COVID-19. From a preventive point of view, it is hence important to take care both of those who are already suffering from psychological disorders and of the non-clinical population, starting to question how psychopathology will change after the pandemic. New treatment directions should be found. The results suggest that to prevent mental disorders, therapists must consider the use of coping strategies in clinical practice. Implications for clinical preventive interventions are reported.

An optimized flow cytometry protocol for simultaneous detection of T cell activation induced markers and intracellular cytokines: Application to SARS-CoV-2 immune individuals.

Antigen (ag)-specific T cell analysis is an important step for investigation of cellular immunity in many settings, such as infectious diseases, cancer and vaccines. Multiparameter flow cytometry has advantages in studying both the rarity and heterogeneity of these cells. In the cellular immunologist's toolbox, the expression of activation-induced markers (AIM) following antigen exposure has made possible the study and sorting of ag-specific T cells without using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-multimers. In parallel, assessing the cytokine profile of responding T cells would support a more comprehensive description of the ongoing immune response by providing information related to cell function, such as polarization and effector activity. Here, a method and flow cytometry panel were optimized to combine the detection of activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in a TCR-dependent manner with the evaluation of cytokine production by intracellular staining, without affecting the positivity of activation markers. In particular, the expression of CD134 (OX40) and CD69 have been tested in conjunction with intracellular (ic) CD137 (4-1BB) to detect SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein-specific activated T cells. In our setting, CD134 provided minimal contribution to detect the pool of AIM+ T cells, whereas a key role was described for ic-CD69 which was co-expressed with ic-CD137 in both CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes. Moreover, the analysis of TCR-triggered cytokine-producing T cells (IFNγ, TNFα and IL-2 were assessed) further confirmed the capacity of ic-CD69 to identify functionally responsive antigen-specific T cells which were often largely negative or weakly positive for CD134 expression. In parallel, the use of CD45RA, CCR7 and CXCR5 allowed us to describe the T cell matuarion curve and detect T follicular helper (Tfh) CD4+ cells, including the antigen specific activated subsets. In conclusion, we optimized a method and flow cytometry panel combining assessment of activation induced markers and intracellular cytokines that will be useful for measuring TCR stimulation-dependent activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells.

Coping with COVID Stress: Maladaptive and Adaptive Response Styles Predicting College Student Internalizing Symptom Dimensions.

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly disrupted daily life for undergraduates and introduced new stressors (e.g., campus closures). How individuals respond to stressors can interact with stress to increase disorder risk in both unique and transdiagnostic ways. The current study examined how maladaptive and adaptive stress response styles moderated the perceived severity of COVID-related stressors effect on general and specific internalizing dimensions at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in a combined undergraduate sample across two universities (N = 451) using latent bifactor modeling and LASSO modeling to identify optimal predictors. Results showed that perceived stress severity and maladaptive response styles (not adaptive response styles or interactions between stress and response styles) were associated with both common and specific internalizing dimensions. Results suggest additive associations of stress severity and maladaptive coping with internalizing symptoms during the pandemic's beginning, and provide important insights for screening, prevention, and intervention during future public health crises. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10862-022-09975-7.

Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on injection-based practice: report from an Italian multicenter and multidisciplinary survey.

Background: There are no papers exploring the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the injection-based practice in patients affected by different rheumatic diseases, including osteoarthritis. The aim was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on injection-based practice trough the Italian country. Study design: A survey-based retrospective cross-sectional study. Methods: An Italian-language questionnaire was developed by a group of senior researchers and distributed by e-mail to some Rheumatology, Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Units from different geographic areas of Italy. The survey included information about the number of injections performed during COVID-19 pandemic (stratified by injected agents and injected joint), in comparison to the pre-pandemic period, and the possible reasons behind an eventual reduction. Responses were collected and descriptive analysis calculated. Results: Eleven centers of the National Health Service completed the survey. The activities of the injections services significantly decreased across the country with a percentage of reduction of 60% compared to the pre-pandemic period. A significant reduction of both intra-articular and peri-articular injections was registered. Among intra-articular. treatments, the most affected ones were the hyaluronic acid injections, when compared to corticosteroids. A significant decrease of the total amount of peri-articular injections was observed. The strict government restrictions and the fear of patients to become infected represented the most limiting factors. Conclusions: The reported decrease of the injection-based practice in our country during the COVID-19 pandemic highlights the detrimental effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of chronic musculoskeletal diseases with possible negative consequences in terms of disability and quality of life.